We should stop asking those questions. What would that change anyway? Don't look at the past and mourn, look at the now and future and how you (with your commits, ideas and help for the community) could make Wonder even better and more useful for you and everyone else! Pascal wrote what is needed:
"[…] we need help on documentation, unit testing, marketing, the list of needs is quite long." So anyone who wants Wonder to keep a sexy technology and to continue to grow should contribute his/her part. If you don't have any patches to commit but have other strengths, those are needed too. In one word: participate! :) Am 28.03.2012 um 20:46 schrieb Pascal Robert: > If Mike still works there, I guess they are still working on it :-) But are > they using it for new stuff, I don't know. > >> By the way, do we have any evidences of Apple's commitment to continue >> using WO internally? Did anyone check - do they continue using it for >> their own new projects? >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Pascal Robert <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Le 2012-03-28 à 05:24, Gino Pacitti a écrit : >>> >>>> Well I for one would like to have some sort of contribution scheme fixed >>>> on an annual membership for development etc... >>>> >>>> And just so I am not too behind on what is the current state of the union >>>> - what is the Apple current think on WO. I think I read here that they are >>>> no longer contributing to its development. Is that correct? Any one know >>>> of their plans for the software? >>> >>> They keep it for themselves, and it won't change, plain and simple. Many >>> things have been done to try to change that, and nothing worked. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
