Thanks Kieran and Ted,

That's a pretty good way to go:)
I think I'll need to create one "application" in WOMonitor per configuration as 
they will answer on different domain name and I don't want to get a load 
balancing between instances that have different properties.

Xavier

On 2 avr. 2012, at 17:43, Kieran Kelleher wrote:

> You could have 10 Properties files ...
> 
> Properties.config01
> Properties.config02
> Properties.config03
> etc.
> 
> 
> And then in WOMonitor (or even development launch arguments, just specify the 
> property extension as the java "user name", in which case ERXProperties will 
> ensure that the properties in that file override all other Properties files. 
> For for a deployed app that you want to run  with Properties.config01, just 
> add this in WOMonitor:
> 
> -Duser.name=config01
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 2, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Dev WO wrote:
> 
>> Hi WOmates,
>> 
>> I'm actually rewritting a project to make it more "multiple configuration" 
>> aware.
>> 
>> I need to define a little more the "multiple configuration" setup:
>> -the same code-base will have about 10s different configurations (like 
>> language setup and custom UI layout)
>> -each configuration would serve in the range of 100s (maybe 1000s) users
>> 
>> My original idea was to create a single project in Eclipse and have a 
>> build.xml file for each configuration (providing the language(s), the 
>> database connection details, etc), that way I could have a specific database 
>> for each configuration and be able to update based on the configuration 
>> (like if configuration are used on different timezone, I can have a more 
>> optimized downtime window), in addition to isolate the data for each 
>> configuration.
>> 
>> I haven't completely look into the build.xml to see if I could use it to 
>> achieve "per built" Properties and includes for example.
>> 
>> But do you think it's the way to do it or is there a better way to manage 
>> this, mostly on the maintenance and future development perspective (having a 
>> single project seams pretty interesting to me)?
>> 
>> It shouldn't really matter for now, but it would also be my first move into 
>> D2W;)
>> 
>> Thanks for your comments,
>> 
>> Xavier
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com
>> 
>> This email sent to [email protected]
> 
> 
> 


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to