Pascal makes a really good point! If we,
as a community, were able to standardize the workspace to INCLUDE WOnder and the frameworks and install setup, so that one could indeed build->deploy reliably etc. that would be amazingly useful. we would all be using the same developer setup core which would provide tons of reliability and visibility benefits to everyone. We could call it ... fluffy monkey. On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Pascal Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. And I'm willing to give $75 to anyone who back extend Golipse so that it > also install Wonder and the core WO frameworks along Eclipse, WOLips and > Workspace Mechanics. Bonus points if your solution also work on Windows and > Linux. It doesn't have to be Golipse, but it have to install Workspace > Mechanics. > >> I submit that if folks have troubles with golips or its configuration >> somehow, >> >> we put in the community-wide effort to ensure that whatever fixes or >> workarounds might be required are reflected in golips. >> >> for example -- if we have troubles with a release of Eclipse, >> >> or anything like that -- the best and safest place for the whole community >> has got to be golips. >> >> besides, people have already put a ton of great work into golips, >> >> reliably creating a new developer environment is __KEY__ >> >> if go lips doesn't work for you, be sure at least to post to the list so we >> can take a look, because we're all doing the same stuff here -- using >> golips, we're watching out for each other. >> >> just my two cents there -- >> >> >> >> On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:03 AM, "Ângelo Andrade Cirino" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Pascal, >>> >>> Em 10/09/2012, às 11:23, Pascal Robert escreveu: >>>> >>>> What do you have in the EO_PK_TABLE table? And this part of a migration? >>> >>> The EO_PK_TABLE isn't part of the migration and is correctly created after >>> the first inserts in the database. Interesting enough, the PK table is >>> updated even for the failed attachment insert attempts. For instance, the >>> ERAttachments PKs are ERAttachment = 5 and ERAttachmentData = 5 after my >>> attempts to insert new images, but the database only holds one image so far >>> for the first and only successful insert. All the other PKs are correct. >>> >>>> >>>> Do you have the JDBC properties set with the same values in all 3 apps? >>> >>> Yes, the three applications use exactly the same JDBC properties from one >>> single and shared framework. I set up this framework to hold the models and >>> the JDBC connections. I've played with the JDBC properties being loaded by >>> three different methods: the model, the properties file and from a >>> notification. The three methods give the same outcome. >>> >>> I am clueless. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Angelo >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jtayler%40oeinc.com >>> >>> This email sent to [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
