ah, thanks - I see.

I was using a method via REST that called the attachment processor, but I guess 
in my web/d2w app it is relying on my properties setting?

er.attachment.storageType=s3

should I set the delegate in a specific way since I don’t seem to have access 
to the created processor? a default delegate or shared processor somewhere?



On Aug 2, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Matt Ness <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jesse,
> 
> Your processor delegate has the attachmentAvailable() interface method. 
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/08/2013, at 9:27 AM, Jesse Tayler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Agreed
>> 
>> This really should be done on completion of the otherwise successful S3 
>> attachment push, it would seem.
>> 
>> Is there a call, or notification I should be attending in ERAttachemnt for 
>> such?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 2, 2013, at 6:53 PM, Ramsey Gurley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Never make side effects in your getter/setters. Definitely do not override 
>>> takeStoredValueForKey. John's recommendation of didInsert sounds like the 
>>> proper place in the EO lifecycle to call it, assuming this is actually 
>>> model logic. Using the intermediate entity as David suggested is what I 
>>> always do for ERAttachments. Do generate an entity class. As for 
>>> awakeFromInsertion, unlearn what you have learned. Use wonder's init() 
>>> instead. awakeFromInsertion can be called more than once due to bugs in 
>>> EOF. That's the reason init() exists.
>>> 
>>> My 2¢ :-)
>>> 
>>> On Aug 2, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks Tim,
>>>> 
>>>> I can readily see that I’d have been well advised to use an interim entity 
>>>> like “Document” or something.
>>>> 
>>>> sigh.
>>>> 
>>>> I’m guessing it’s not a good idea to try and make the ERAttachment a 
>>>> subclass or EO of my own.
>>>> 
>>>> maybe I should use the takeStoredValueForKey, check if the key is a change 
>>>> in the poster relationship and then fire the script?
>>>> 
>>>> that might preserve the model, while firing the script only when the save 
>>>> is a change on the relationship?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Timothy Worman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Your override would not be called if the updating process is using 
>>>>> takeStoredValueForKey.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tim
>>>>> UCLA GSE&IS
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 2, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Jesse Tayler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have an override of a normal EO setter, but for some reason, it isn’t 
>>>>>> called but the value does get updated
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I really just want to fire off a unix process once a new posterId has 
>>>>>> been set, so maybe there’s a smarter way but I thought this would be 
>>>>>> reliably called once and only after there’s a known primary key id for 
>>>>>> that poster (ERAttachment)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any thoughts on that?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   @Override
>>>>>>   public void setPosterId(Integer value) {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40smarthealth.com
>>>> 
>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/matt%40logicsquad.net
>> 
>> This email sent to [email protected]
> 
> 


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to