As I have done the error many times in the past, are you sure about the 15 
minutes? The delay is in ms not in seconds.

I now write those constant like this: 
EOEditingContext.setDefaultFetchTimestampLag (15*60*1000);

I do not see how using the session EOEditingContext would change anything 
except for this settings. I would try to create an EC and set it's 
fetchTimestamp to something in the past to see if this change the behaviour.  

Samuel

Le 2013-12-10 à 09:20, Michael Kondratov <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Time lag is 15 minutes. Rest routes seem to always fetch data from the 
> database unless I manually fault objects into session's editing context. It's 
> a huge performance hit.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Dec 10, 2013, at 8:34, Samuel Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> The snapshot cache is under EOEditingContext. Check your 
>> EOEditingContext.defaultFetchTimestampLag(), if is it very low, you are 
>> asking for refreshed objects when you fetch.
>> 
>> Samuel
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 2013-12-09 à 13:09, Michael Kondratov <[email protected]> a 
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>> Is there an easy way to get ERRest to use session’s default editing context 
>>> if session is available? It seems I am missing out on WebObject’s snapshot 
>>> caching when not using long lived editing contexts.
>>> 
>>> Michael Kondratov
>>> Aspire Auctions _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/samuel%40samkar.com
>>> 
>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>> 


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to