Am 29.01.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Markus Ruggiero <[email protected]>:
> On 29.01.2014, at 16:15, Musall Maik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Am 29.01.2014 um 16:08 schrieb Þór Sigurðsson <[email protected]>: >> >>> Don't queue the email - that's something the mail server itself is >>> proficient at, not the WO framework (or any framework on top of that). >> >> I’m not talking about re-inventing SMTP servers. But we had a case where the >> spooling filesystem of the SMTP server ran full, so it failed to accept any >> new email, and data got lost. I only want to ensure that nothing is silently >> lost while the app thinks the mail is safely on it’s way out. > > As far as I know you cannot guarantee this. The mail can get lost underway > without you ever knowing. So even if you have successfully sent your mail, > the recipient might never get it. Of course. But we control the SMTP server, and if we didn’t lose the mail until the point where the remote SMTP server accepted it, it’s not our fault and we have the log files to prove it. Good enough. Maik _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
