Thanks, I didn't know about this class. Seems like Wonder has invented it all, like the ancient Greeks invented all the ideas.
Le 21 mars 2014 à 17:55, Kieran Kelleher <[email protected]> a écrit : > er.extensions.eof.ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship<S, D> might meet your needs > here. In your B.mightDelete() (not willDelete()) you can call > ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship.deleteAllObjectsRelationships(). > > > On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:30 PM, Jean Pierre Malrieu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Suppose I have a mandatory to-one relationship from A to B. Suppose there is >> no inverse relationship (many A's can be related to the same B, so I don't >> want many As to be faulted when I fetch a B). >> What if the smarter way to ensure that A is deleted when I delete it's B? >> (assuming it is the correct behavior for me). >> >> TIA >> >> JPM >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kelleherk%40gmail.com >> >> This email sent to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
