Hi Samuel,

You should be able to define a regex in the validation rules preferences. 
Eclipse > Preferences > WOLips > Validation Rules.

Fabian

Am 27.03.2014 um 14:01 schrieb Samuel Pelletier <[email protected]>:

> Aaron,
> 
> I never found a way to remove the warning "Unable to verify operator 
> sum.periodes.count" for these except by writing a method that do the same:
> 
> <wo:if condition = "[email protected]" negate = "YES">
> <wo:string value = "[email protected]" numberformat = 
> "0.00"/>
> 
> Is there a known way to tell the validator to remove the warning for the 
> aggregation operators?
> 
> Samuel
> 
> 
> Le 2014-03-25 à 23:23, Aaron Rosenzweig <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
>> Hi Christoph,
>> 
>> “valid” works with inline bindings and you can wrap inline bindings across 
>> newlines too.
>> 
>> Here’s an example:
>> 
>> <wo:popUpButton 
>>      list = "$allNamespaces” 
>>      item="$namespaceItem” 
>>      displayString="$namespaceItem.displayName” 
>>      noSelectionString="Any” 
>>      selection="$aDisplayGroup.queryMatch.toApplicantApplicationNamespace 
>> //VALID" />
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> AARON ROSENZWEIG / Chat 'n Bike
>> e:  [email protected]  t:  (301) 956-2319
>>      
>> 
>> On Mar 25, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Christoph Wick <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Aehm, yes, sorry. I meant inline bindings.
>>> 
>>> AFAIK there's nothing like the // VALID for inline bindings. 
>>> But I'd love to learn that there is something ...
>>> 
>>> C.U.CW
>>> -- 
>>> What are the three enemies of a programmer? Sunlight, oxygen, and the 
>>> appalling roar of the birds.
>>> 
>>> On 25.03.2014, at 23:01, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I would have thought that WOGNL expressions were exempt from validation.  
>>>> If not, the //VALID should work for them too.
>>>> 
>>>> Did you mean inline bindings?  I am not sure if there is anything to use 
>>>> with inline bindings.
>>>> 
>>>> Chuck
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2014-03-25, 2:57 PM, "Christoph Wick" wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Chuck,
>>>> 
>>>> is there something like the "// VALID" marker if you are using WOOngl?
>>>> 
>>>> "// VALID" is working only if you are using WOD, isn't it?
>>>> 
>>>> C.U.CW
>>>> --
>>>> What are the three enemies of a programmer? Sunlight, oxygen, and the 
>>>> appalling roar of the birds.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 25.03.2014, at 17:47, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The // VALID marker is the intended way to fix validation problems like 
>>>> this.
>>>> Chuck
>>>> On 2014-03-25, 7:33 AM, "Filippo Laurìa" wrote:
>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>> I have a simple `component id generator` that implements
>>>> `NSKeyValueCodingAdditions`. Something like this:
>>>> public class ComponentIDGenerator implements NSKeyValueCodingAdditions {
>>>>   private String idBase;
>>>>   public ComponentIDGenerator(
>>>> WOComponent component) {
>>>>     idBase = "_" + component.context().elementID().replace('.', '_');
>>>>   }
>>>>   public Object valueForKeyPath(String keypath) {
>>>>     return get(keypath);
>>>>   }
>>>>   public String get(String keypath) {
>>>>     String suffix = keypath.replace('.', '_');
>>>>     return idBase + "_" + suffix;
>>>>   }
>>>>   ...
>>>> }
>>>> I pasted it because it is really simple to understand.
>>>> When initializing a component (in the appendToResponse() method) the
>>>> generator is called like this:
>>>> `String idFor = new ComponentIDGenerator(this);`
>>>> In the wod, when I try to access keys like:
>>>> `idFor.foo` or `idFor.bar` i get WO Template errors from WOLips:
>>>> "there is no key foo for the keypath idFor".
>>>> It's useless to say that at runtime everything runs fine.
>>>> I found two ways to workaround this issues:
>>>> 1) use WOGNL expression in the wod. So i use ~idFor.foo
>>>> 2) foreach key create a getKey method. For example: getFoo()
>>>>   return idFor.valueForKey("foo").toString();
>>>> I don't like those two ways:
>>>> the first because it is not our purpose to use WOGNL framework in the
>>>> application,
>>>> the second because the work load becomes very huge.
>>>> Maybe there is a third way:
>>>> put // VALID next to the wod defecting property-value pair, like
>>>> id = idFor.foo; // VALID
>>>> I want to know if is there a correct way to remove this kind of errors
>>>> between those i mentioned before, or maybe something better.
>>>> Thank you for reading.
>>>> Regards,
>>>>   Filippo Lauria
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/wicki%40me.com
>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
>>>> 
>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/aaron%40chatnbike.com
>>> 
>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/samuel%40samkar.com
>> 
>> This email sent to [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists.fabian%40e-lumo.com
> 
> This email sent to [email protected]


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to