On Tue, 06 May 2014 20:35:08 +0000 Chuck Hill <ch...@global-village.net> wrote:
> +1 > > I am ok with what is being said. The wo list does get the eyeballs. We are, then, relying on Apple for the mailing list. This may come back to bite us in the future. Not that Apple would not always wish to be helpful to the community. I know we always feel the love. I am just saying. - ray > On 2014-05-06, 1:33 PM, "Pascal Robert" wrote: > > IHMO, the Wonder mailing list should go away. I don't see why we need > two mailing lists when 95% of the community use Wonder too. And the > Apple mailing list have more people in it. > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "CHRISTOPH WICK | i4innovation GmbH, Bonn" > <c...@i4innovation.de<mailto:c...@i4innovation.de>> À: > webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com<mailto:webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Envoyé: Mardi 6 Mai 2014 16:27:16 Objet: Re: Wonder documentation on > jenkins.wocommunity.org broken? > > Hi there, > > First of all thanks to those who fixed it. > > Second: On 06.05.2014, at 21:40, Ray Kiddy > <r...@ganymede.org<mailto:r...@ganymede.org>> wrote: > > ps: By the way, is there a reason that this entire question has been > on the WO list? There is a wonder list, yes? And this question does > seem to be completely wonder-specific and not about WebObjects. Just > curious. > > Yes, there is a wonder list. It was probably my fault to post this > original question on this (WebObjects) list. Sorry for that. > > But does it really make sense these days to distinguish between WO > and Wonder? The community has become relatively small and I > personally don't know nobody who is using pure WebObjects without > Wonder. IMHO we should concentrate on as few resources as possible. > And this Apple-provided list is still my first address. > > So once again sorry, if I bothered someone. > > C.U.CW > -- > What are the three enemies of a programmer? Sunlight, oxygen, and the > appalling roar of the birds. > > > On 06.05.2014, at 21:40, Ray Kiddy > <r...@ganymede.org<mailto:r...@ganymede.org>> wrote: > > On Tue, 6 May 2014 09:34:30 +0200 > "Markus Stoll, junidas GmbH" > <markus.st...@junidas.de<mailto:markus.st...@junidas.de>> wrote: > looks nice again, but why are explaining code snippets (wrapped in > <pre> tags) set to "display: none;" ? I would prefer to include them. > Markus > I am not sure, but obviously the new stylesheet has changed things. I > also noticed that both the Japanese and English comments are shown > even though the same CSS "display:none;" thing is supposed to block > one of them. By default, the Japanese should not be visible. That is > what I see at the bottom of the mystylesheet.css file. > We will see. > I figured it would be better to get it back up looking mostly right, > than slow that down to fix all the issues. > - ray > ps: By the way, is there a reason that this entire question has been > on the WO list? There is a wonder list, yes? And this question does > seem to be completely wonder-specific and not about WebObjects. Just > curious. Am 06.05.2014 um 04:44 schrieb Ray Kiddy > <r...@ganymede.org<mailto:r...@ganymede.org>>: The javadoc has been > updated and is looking fairly normal. A new stylesheet had to be > included. cheers - ray > http://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/Wonder/lastSuccessfulBuild/javadoc/? > On Sun, 04 May 2014 22:01:03 +0200 > Christoph Wick <wi...@me.com<mailto:wi...@me.com>> wrote: > Hi List, > is the Wonder documentation on > http://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/Wonder/javadoc broken? > It looks as if all the style information is missing. > C.U.CW _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
