Hi all, I seem to be missing something with the wonder Property
er.migration.skipModelNames If I have an application-level Model, say "AppLevelModel", which has an EO or two with relationships to a framework model, say "ERAttachment", and have the following Properties in the application: er.migration.migrateAtStartup=true er.migration.createTablesIfNecessary=true er.migration.modelNames=AppLevelModel er.migration.skipModelNames=ERAttachment what should I expect to occur at runtime? As it stands, the migration process attempts to run the ERAttachment0 java class, which is not really what I want, and fails as those tables are already in the db. I perhaps naively expected all values in that property to be skipped. This comes about (for me at least) when introducing the migration pattern into an existing application with a db schema already up and running. I obviously want to keep my db values in place and not have to 'start from scratch'. Anyone used/using er.migration.skipModelNames? I have an (ugly) workaround, but I'd like to know if my understanding of the pattern is wrong. Regards, Matt -- http://logicsquad.net
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
