Hi Thomas,

It generally works. We use it a lot in our projects. 

Certainly… there could be a bug, but the only big one that I’m aware of is that 
you cannot use flattened relationships. 

You might play with the boolean switch that converts it from an “Exists” into 
an “In” Qualifier. 

There’s a presentation here:

http://www.chatnbike.com/presentation_existsQualifier/

Video of it is on the WOCommunity site.
AARON ROSENZWEIG / Chat 'n Bike
e:  aa...@chatnbike.com  t:  (301) 956-2319             
        

On Sep 28, 2014, at 6:50 AM, Thomas LATTER <latter...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there a known bug on ERXExistsQualifiers? The generated SQL code is false. 
> It compares the primary keys of both tables instead of the foreign key and 
> primary key as specified in the relationship. Someone posted this same bug in 
> 2011, has anyone been able to use them since and otherwise what would be the 
> best alternative ?
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/aaron%40chatnbike.com
> 
> This email sent to aa...@chatnbike.com

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
  • [no subject] Thomas LATTER
    • Re: Theodore Petrosky
    • Re: Bug in ERXExistsQualifiers? Aaron Rosenzweig
    • Re: Ted Archibald

Reply via email to