Hello there, the order of INSERT adaptor ops, it is essentially random or is there some logic behind?
Months ago, on a server the admin added a DB foreign key restraint (immediate not deferrable, alas); since it worked all right, they did not bother to tell me. I do not re-order adaptor ops in the delegate method (but I do log them), and today I've found that for the first time in months, the code instead of INSERT T_AUCTION INSERT T_AUDIT as always so far now did generate those two in the opposite order -- which of course crashed, for there's the FK restraint in T_AUDIT. The solutions are more or less self-evident (change the restraint to deferred, or re-order the ops; have I forgot anything?), but I do wonder: might the sudden change be a result of something I did in my code? Or was it a pure blind chance that it did work so far without a glitch? Thanks and all the best, OC _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
