We originally wanted then hosted by a “neutral” company so that if one of us 
went out of business that the resources would not be lost.  This has happened 
before (anyone remember WOCode?).  When facing the loss of your business, the 
community assets are probably not at the front of people’s minds.   We also 
wanted it neutral so that it could be an advocate for WO.  Given that the 
community is shrinking and I don’t see any large entity stepping up to sponsor 
WO, moving these assets to one of the companies volunteering seems appropriate. 
 Perhaps two could arrange to co-operate to maintain a replica “just in case”.

Chuck


On 2016-05-12, 12:21 AM, 
"[email protected] on behalf of Musall 
Maik" <[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>> Am 12.05.2016 um 09:02 schrieb Jean Pierre Malrieu <[email protected]>:
>> Is it really necessary to migrate all the tools and services now? Why don’t 
>> we just pay a little bit more to get the current ones running? That should 
>> not be too expensive.
>
>IMHO those services have always been a little on the expensive side. We should 
>migrate them to any of the companies that have now offered to do it for free 
>(ours included).
>
>Maik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40gevityinc.com
>
>This email sent to [email protected]


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to