Samuel,

On 21. 9. 2016, at 1:24, Samuel Pelletier <sam...@samkar.com> wrote:

> Did you created the M:N relationship using the modeler or you created it 
> manually ?

Manually (well through my own modeller, which boils down to precisely the same 
result). Nevertheless, I have done this umpteen times before; and this is the 
first time I have bumped into any problem.

> Your situation may be caused by an improper flattened relationship settings. 
> The flattened relationships should have nothing checked in the Advanced pane 
> of the modeler.

I went trough my “EOModeller User Guide”, but alas, there does not seem to be a 
snapshot of the Advanced Relationship pane, so I am not sure what precisely has 
been in there. Owns Destination and Delete Rule, I guess?

> On my models, I always create them with the modeler and the relationships to 
> the inner entity does not have "own relationship" checked but have the 
> "Propagate primary key" checked.

Anyway, to be sure, I have tried both combinations (“owsDestination” YES/NO and 
“propagatesPrimaryKey” YES/NO) in the relationship dictionary, to no avail — 
always the same result, the snapshot is not set.

Thanks a lot,
OC

>> Le 20 sept. 2016 à 14:50, o...@ocs.cz a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello there,
>> 
>> I have a pretty common setup: entities User and DataBlock, an M:N 
>> relationship represented by an intermediate entity containing just the two 
>> keys, flattened on both sides. At both sides the relationships are 
>> appropriately flattened. Set to own destination+delete rule cascade.
>> 
>> The problem is, upon inserting a new DataBlock and its relationship to a 
>> current user, beside the two objects which should be inserted (the new 
>> DataBlock and the new relationship), relationships to other (old) 
>> DataBlocks, which were before simply _fetched_ for the current user (just to 
>> display the current state), get inserted too — which, of course, causes an 
>> integrity constraint violation “this PK already exists“.
>> 
>> My code looks essentially like this:
>> 
>> ===
>> EOEditingContext ec= ...
>> DBDataBlock ndb=new DBDataBlock()
>> ec.insertObject(ndb)
>> ndb.addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey(currentUser,'dataBlockUsers')
>> // logs here, see below
>> ec.saveChanges()
>> ===
>> 
>> Immediately before ec.saveChanges(), I log out
>> 
>> (a) ec.insertedObjects(), which contains only one object (I have overridden 
>> toString() to get the PK /and other attributes, removed here for 
>> conciseness/ of an EO):
>> 
>> [<DBDataBlock@79adaefa PK:null>]
>> 
>> this is all right, null PK means a newly added object, it's the very 'ndb' 
>> datablock I just have inserted and which I am now saving.
>> 
>> (b) contents of the flattened M:N relationship 'ndb.dataBlockUsers' from the 
>> DBDataBlock@79adaefa to DBUser, which looks like this:
>> 
>> [<DBUser@71b29988 PK:1000005>]
>> 
>> again, quite all right: only one related user, the currentUser which I have 
>> just added to the relationship.
>> 
>> (c) contents of the flattened M:N inverse relationship from the current 
>> user, which looks like this:
>> 
>> [<DBDataBlock@189f083a PK:1000003>, <DBDataBlock@1b47d247 PK:1000016>, 
>> <DBDataBlock@5f927095 PK:1000019>, <DBDataBlock@54edfe4c PK:1000022>, 
>> <DBDataBlock@35e1e59c PK:1000023>, <DBDataBlock@793b3d6d PK:1000024>, 
>> <DBDataBlock@7b06dee8 PK:1000029>, <DBDataBlock@2550aab9 PK:1000033>, 
>> <DBDataBlock@79adaefa PK:null>]
>> 
>> for the third time, all right: 8 of them previously fetched, already 
>> existing relationships to other (old) datablocks for the current user, plus 
>> one new relationship to the newly added DBDataBlock@79adaefa. Perfect so far.
>> 
>> At this moment, ec.saveChanges is performed. I log the database operations 
>> from databaseContextWillPerformAdaptorOperations delegate method, and it 
>> looks like this:
>> 
>> ===
>> -IN-adaptorOps === SPC: about to perform 10 DB operations    |19:54:37.061 
>> 20.9.16|WorkerThread1
>>              - 1: INSERT on 'DBDataBlock'  1{uid:1000042}
>>              - 2: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000023, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 3: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000022, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 4: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000003, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 5: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000016, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 6: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000042, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 7: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000019, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 8: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000029, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 9: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000024, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>>              - 10: INSERT on 'DB_UserDataBlock'  2{db_id:1000033, 
>> user_id:1000005}
>> ===
>> 
>> i.e., along with inserting the two new objects (1: the new datablock, 6: the 
>> new relationship), EOF for some darned reason decides to insert _also_ all 
>> those relationship objects it _fetched_ before! Of course, since they were 
>> fetched, they already exist in the database, and thus cause an integrity 
>> constraint violation “this PK already exists“.
>> 
>> Well, logging out 
>> "currentUser.editingContext().committedSnapshotForObject(currentUser)['userDataBlock']"
>>  before saveChanges, I get an empty array. I must admit I don't know whether 
>> there should be the relationship objects in this snapshot, but anyway:
>> 
>> - if not, I have no idea where to find the culprit;
>> - if yes, well, the culprit of those inserts is explained, but why on earth 
>> the snapshot is not properly maintained by EOF?!?
>> 
>> Any idea what might be the culprit, or at least, how to find it? I am afraid 
>> I am rather out of ideas :/
>> 
>> Thanks a lot,
>> OC
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/samuel%40samkar.com
>> 
>> This email sent to sam...@samkar.com
> 


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to