No, but the number is obviously suspect as a "limit" and so just google that, repair and go on about your day...
> On Sep 5, 2020, at 9:04 PM, b...@xmsi.com wrote: > > So I believe all the apps are running but I don’t think the Apache WOAdaptor > believes that. I just noticed that It shows 128 running instances instead of > the proper 180. 128 seems like a suspicious number does anyone know if there > is some limit set in place X to number of running instances the adaptor will > allow? > > > >> On Sep 5, 2020, at 20:52, Jesse Tayler <jtay...@oeinc.com> wrote: >> >> Well, I don’t know but each app has a port assigned and you should see that >> in monitor and in ps -axww or whatever you should be able to see which >> instances are which. >> >> You should be able to hit instances specifically using a URL with the woport >> somehow on the URL, perhaps someone recalls or you can look that up. >> >> But from the sound of it, those tools should tell you what instances are in >> the load balance or not. >> >> >>> On Sep 5, 2020, at 8:44 PM, bob--- via Webobjects-dev >>> <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi I would really appreciate any help you have to offer. >>> >>> I’m looking for help debugging why the Adaptor does not show all the >>> instances that monitor shows as running. I believe this is causing users >>> not to hit many instances that are running. >>> >>> I have a single webserver with 6 appservers. I have 2 applications all them >>> A and B, A is configured for 25 instances per server B has 10 per server. >>> A has the complication that there are Odd/Even week executables so there >>> are actually 50 configured but only 25 running at a time. Everything looks >>> fine in WOMonitor and the apps do launch. I enabled adaptorInfo so I could >>> see more about my problem. >>> >>> I am able to hit instances of B and WOStats seems to show that users are >>> spread across B. However Users are not hitting all the instances of A. I >>> see the A’s are all running as expected, The A logs look fine and do show >>> that noone is hitting them. I looked in the Adaptor info and found that >>> servers 6,7 don’t show up in the Adaptor info. >>> >>> I had been using named host 1085 style for WebObjectsConfig >>> >>> I changed to the XML file and didn’t see any change in the adaptor. >>> >>> I worried that maybe all the not running A instances were somehow >>> interfering since the config.xml file did have ALL the instances not just >>> the running ones. So I manually removed 1/2 of the A entries to only have >>> the running ones. No change. >>> >>> B does have fewer total instances but they all show up in the adaptor info. >>> >>> Would really appreciate any thoughts on how to get the apps to show up for >>> the adaptor so users can actually hit them. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jtayler%40oeinc.com >>> >>> This email sent to jtay...@oeinc.com >> > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
