Ok, then consider me nominating WebObjects for "Best Java IDE" and
"Most innovative Java product" and "Best Java class library".
Further consider me nominating the FSF's free CVS system as
"Best Team Development Tool".
Greetings,
Ronald
you wrote:
> Ronald,
>
> Nothing is biased. Apple a has a million dollar public relations activity
> and they need to nominate their products in the right categories. We can't
> nominate them for you. As Ronald, you can nominate any product you wish as
> well and we will add them to the list. That simple.No controversy around
> here..
>
> Best,
>
> Fuat
>
>
> At 06:13 AM 3/3/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >Can anyone tell me why the %&(*%%^#* conducting the survey don't
> >list WebOobjects in the IDE and Java class library sections?
> >I'd say EOF/FoundationKit/AppKit and IB/PB, which are part of the
> >WO product, would certainly qualify WO to be listed in these categories...
> >
> >And as far as Team Development Tools go: CVS is still way up there,
> >but of course not listed, cause it's free, as if that were a
> >bad thing...
> >
> >Last but not least, WebObjects is simply omitted from the
> >"most innovative Java product" category. Now, if that's
> >not biased, what is?
> >
> >Ronald
==============================================================================
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists
in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the
unreasonable man." G.B. Shaw | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | NeXT-mail welcome
