I actually meant the *new infogami*, you know, the one that is used in
the openlibrary.org
Anyway, once there is an up and running application on the air,  I
think it would be easier for community developers who want to
contribute for the documentation.


On Sep 8, 8:19 pm, Adam Atlas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well... infogami.com is pretty much abandoned (Aaron sold it to the
> same company that bought Reddit, I think, and they haven't been
> developing it any further). Which is a problem because of the
> relatively meager feature set (and the general lack of support).
>
> We used to be using webpy.infogami.com, but we moved the wiki to
> webpy.org (merging the small amount of content on the old Trac wiki
> into it) for those reasons. Webpy.org is now powered by "the new
> infogami", which I'm guessing is the third wikiish web app named
> "Infogami" written by Aaron. (Infogami.com was the second that I know
> of, and zpedia.org, another site by Aaron, was "powered by" an
> "Infogami" that appeared to be a still earlier iteration.) So if
> we're going by the brand name alone, we *are* using Infogami. And
> presumably a better one than the one running on infogami.com.
>
> On 8 Sep 2007, at 12:39, Tzury wrote:> Guys,
> > Why not use infogami as the wiki platform for documentation? Am I
> > missing something?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web.py" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to