Anand wrote: >> I don't think the given examples state this, so -- could we also >> introduce a response object that could be explicitly used within the >> handler methods? >> > I don't see any additional additional advantage by doing so? > I think I'm just challenging myself to think whether we should reserve the names `request` and `response` to describe most of what is currently stuffed in web.ctx. This might make the web.py code itself even more readable. For example seeing things like
web.request.headers web.request.body web.response.headers web.response.body within the implementation might be a nice touch. YMMV. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
