On 2007-10-21 10:29, Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Have you tried compared Tenjin with Mako templates[1]? People claim
> that Mako is very fast.
>
> [1]:http://www.makotemplates.org/
I tried Mako and found that Tenjin is still faster than Mako.
The following is a benchmark result of mine.
(The benchmark script will be included in the next release of Tenjin.)
This shows that Mako is fast but Tenjin is more than twice faster than
Mako.
MacOS X 10.4, Intel CoreDuo 1.83GHz, Python 2.5.1
utime stime total real
tenjin 6.43000 0.49000 6.92000 6.93736
tenjin-nocache 20.16000 0.42000 20.58000 20.59872
tenjin-reuse 5.51000 0.06000 5.57000 5.58198
cheetah 20.45000 0.03000 20.48000 20.50290
cheetah-reuse 19.91000 0.02000 19.93000 19.98685
mako 16.85000 0.98000 17.83000 18.54418
mako-reuse 13.40000 0.02000 13.42000 13.43029
mako-nocache 236.16000 1.79000 237.95000 238.64915
templetor 421.41000 4.10000 425.51000 427.12557
templetor-reuse 61.18000 0.10000 61.28000 61.52955
--
makoto kuwata
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web.py" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
