Tom Berger wrote: > On 11/01/2008, bubblboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >> as far as I know, there is no "best" framework; it all depends on the >> circumstances. > > Strictly speaking, if you measure all the frameworks in all the > circumstances, some of them will be better in more circumstances than > others, and the one that is going to be better in the most > circumstances is the best one. ;) > > Tom
It's exactly that useless definition of "good" that confuses so many people who don't stop and think for themselves for a second. You can see it in areas like programming languages, cars, operating systems.. pretty much everywhere. The definition you just described is common but finds only use in statistics. When somebody wants to pick a framework, he should not look at what framework covers most areas, he should look at what framework covers /his/ areas. I know you did not mean to say that, I just took the opportunity to make a point :) Greetings, b^4 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
