Seeing how you use it in a way that's better than a rdbms would be nice, rather than 'just not possible'. Code comparison examples would be interesting for one; 'with couchdb' vs 'with mysql' in python or what have you. -- Adam
On Jan 3, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Brent Pedersen wrote: > > not to be an ass, but this looks like the typical hype. there's zero > content in that post. i'd be truly interested to hear how you > _actually_ use couchdb in a way that would not be possible with an > rdbms. what you have there looks like poor digg-fodder, complete with > title "top 10 reasons ..." with a list that actually contains 14 > items. > > again, no offense -- from your replies below, it actually seems like > you have real experience doing some cool stuff. how about writing up > that? > > -brentp > > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:03 PM, paul jobs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> http://pylab.blogspot.com/2009/01/ten-reasons-why-couchdb-is-better-than.html >> >> Guys I wrote up a small list of reasons why i think couchdb is way >> bettter >> than mysql. Do let me know what you think >> >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
