Running all or some of wikipedia ahead of time would not be such a bad
idea, imo. My overall point was that the user experience was poor and
could use some work--just offering constructive criticism.

On Jan 15, 4:58 am, Alex Ksikes <[email protected]> wrote:
> The blank to be guessed is simply the title of the fetched wikipedia
> article. However it is true that words such as "of, the, they etc .."
> should not be blanked in the question. So for example "king of france"
> would be blanked but "of" should not be blanked every where else in
> the question... That problem could be resolved by simply using a stop
> list. I still fail to see the use of heavy weight NLP methods here.
>
> We use a yahoo query in order to restrict questions to specific
> categories. For example the yahoo search terms for the category
> "Movies" could be tv, movies, cinema, actor, actress etc ...
> restricted to the site wikipedia.org.
>
> Here is a the complete set of search terms for each 
> category:http://github.com/alexksikes/wikitrivia/blob/a6a1956621ace2010310a8b2...
>
> Maybe we could use something like open calais to guess the category of
> a random wikipedia article. However that would require we pre-fetch a
> lot of articles before hand.. so we may as well download all of
> wikipedia and use their categories instead ...
>
> 2009/1/14 adelevie <[email protected]>:
>
>
>
> > I was imagining open calais to be used as a tool for selecting which
> > words/phrases to turn into blanks for questions. For example, with
> > open calais, someone would choose to do questions about programming
> > languages, for example. Open Calais knows which words are programming
> > languages.
>
> > On Jan 14, 12:43 pm, Alex Ksikes <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 2009/1/13 adelevie <[email protected]>:
>
> >> > Great idea, although thus far, it is poorly executed. There needs to
> >> > be some way to further limit the topics, as some of these are so
> >> > random, they are impossible to answer. Furthermore, sometimes I would
> >> > be asked to fill in the blank of a discussion page on wikipedia. Maybe
> >> > you should take a look at opencalais to aid with natural language
> >> > processing. Good luck.
>
> >> Don't need something like opencalais for that. You could use the page
> >> rank of the wikipedia article (or yahoo site explorer) to get a feel
> >> of how difficult a question might be. Also you could always show
> >> articles that have an image as a hint to filter out the the bad
> >> questions.
>
> >> There are many improvements for sure and WikiTrivia should be taken
> >> much more as a proof of concept. It'd be nice for example to play with
> >> different languages. Feel free to have a look at the code and improve
> >> on it.
>
> >> Thank you for the feedback.
>
> >> > On Jan 11, 11:04 am, Alex K <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> Hello,
>
> >> >> WikiTrivia, the trivia game freshly generated from Wikipedia articles
> >> >> has been entirely rewritten in webpy and the source code has been made
> >> >> available.
>
> >> >>http://wikitrivia.ksikes.net/http://github.com/alexksikes/wikitrivia/...
>
> >> >> Please feel free to let me know what you think,
>
> >> >> Alex
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web.py" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to