i wasn't trying to offend - i did say "from what i've heard" - too new at wsgi to know much first hand. at the mercy of my peers atm
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected] > wrote: > > > > On Nov 9, 5:15 am, Greg Milby <[email protected]> wrote: > > i have apache installed, but i'm not sold on apache with wsgi (from the > > little i've read on it [people say it creates a lot of load/threads/bulk > and > > the memory is not handled well by apache])... > > That is FUD. > > If you configure Apache/mod\_wsgi appropriately there is no problem > and is comparable to other solutions. > > People who say that tend to be people who can't be bothered to read > documentation properly and set up their systems in a sensible way for > the type of application they run. > > For a description of some of the issues that can come up due to poor > choice of configuration see: > > > http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/03/load-spikes-and-excessive-memory-usage.html > > In short, ensure your application is thread safe, use worker MPM for > Apache and daemon mode for mod_wsgi and you shouldn't have an issue. > If in a memory constrained system or what to get the most out of > Apache/mod_wsgi then use a nginx front end to handle static files and > proxy to Apache/mod_wsgi. This gives better static files sharing > performance and isolates your web application running on back end > server from slow HTTP clients. > > Graham > > > on the other hand, if i > > remember correctly, i heard that lighttpd did great... if running them > > in tandem will not cause any problems, i may do that (each on it's own > > port) > > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Angelo Gladding <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Do you *desire* to use a webserver? If so, installing lighttpd or > Apache > > > using your standard package manager, apt-get for ubuntu, will do the > dirty > > > work of setting up your Upstart or /etc/init.d. > > > > > To be clear, this is the advisable method of deployment. > > > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Greg Milby <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> if memory serves, i think i saw 'setup instructions' for these options > on > > >> the webpy site... i will probably trying everything - see what works > best > > >> (for me). thanks for replying. > > > > >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Wesley Chow <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >>> Has anybody suggested simply running it via Apache with mod_python, > > >>> mod_wsgi, or Lighttpd and fcgi? Seems like the more straightforward > > >>> thing to do. > > > > >>> Wes > > > > >>> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:41 AM, geekbuntu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >>> > right now i have a terminal window running my webpy app - is there > a > > >>> > way to make it run by itself - not dependent on it being executed > > >>> > manually? (like a standard webserver) > > > > >>> > -- > > >>> > Angelo Gladding > > >>> > [email protected] > > >>> >http://angelo.gladding.name/ > > >>> > E69E 47E8 5C3A 96E5 C70F > > >>> > D931 F35C ACBA 6F39 9611 > > > > >>> --- > > >>>http://www.s7labs.com|http://standingrm.com > > > > > -- > > > Angelo Gladding > > > [email protected] > > >http://angelo.gladding.name/ > > > E69E 47E8 5C3A 96E5 C70F > > > D931 F35C ACBA 6F39 9611 > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
