Your arguments are straw-man arguments. And you just lost one deployment. I hope the course your on continues to go well for you.
Best of luck! GL On Mar 19, 3:56 pm, Branko Vukelic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Gregg Lind <[email protected]> wrote: > > The solutions you suggest *do not* in fact solve those problems, which > > are people problems, and perception problems. > > But that's _people_ problem, as you say, not a technical problem. > Completely different issue. I was offering technical solutions to the > problem of packaging conveniently versioned code, not how to solve > people issues. > > Applying technical solutions to people has seldom worked out, because > people have a distorted perception of how things work (e.g, "quality > software must have tags") and there's no way of fixing that with > software tools. I can fully understand your frustrations, but the > approach you're suggesting is just not right. If they don't understand > web.py's virtues and shortcomings, let them be. I doubt a set of tags > would make things dramatically better as you suggest. > > -- > Branko Vukelić > > http://foxbunny.tumblr.com/http://www.flickr.com/photos/16889...@n04/http://www.twitter.com/foxbunnyhttp://github.com/foxbunny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
