To at least provide /some/ counter-weight, I have one argument against: more often than not, tutorials and newbie information is committed to these community driven websites by people who were in the same spot and just figured out how to climb out of it.
Maybe this is not the case for web.py, but by the proposed move you are making that a certainty: newbies and anybody else not intimately familiar with git, github (including pull requests and the like) and github pages are definitely never going to reach this. Perhaps the average mailing list subscriber and/or replyer to this thread is not an accurate sample of the people that we hope will provide us with valuable updates to the websites. I know I would never bother to figure out the details of a project that worked this way.. I never used github pages and only cloned a git repository once. Not to say it should not be done: it may be totally worth it. Just thought it should at least be said. Greetings, Hraban Luyat 2010/11/28 Dragan Espenschied <[email protected]>: >>> What do you think? > > Yes! > Anything that would help keeping the site up to date easier should be done. > > There is quite some outdated info on there still. > > drx > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web.py" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
