>> I posted some details of my initial thoughts on the 22nd, but two immediate
>> action items were to update the wsgiserver code from CherryPy as that is now
>> Python 2/3 compatible, and to identify how to best upgrade to Python 3's
>> unicode handling (moving encoding/decoding to a python 2 only module,
>> perhaps) since that was the biggest issue I ran into with my first attempt.
>
> I think we should start depending on cherrypy-wsgiserver instead of
> shipping a copy with web.py. When we started using it, it was not
> available on pypi.
>
> cherrypy-wsgiserver is not available for Python3, at least on pypi. We
> should provide alternate implementation of dev server using wsgiref.

One of the burdens web.py carries is python2.3 compatibility. When I
last heard, Python 2.3 was still supported on Redhat servers. It might
have changed now. Anybody knows what is the status now?

Anand

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web.py" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.

Reply via email to