> If there are any parts of web.py that you think need to be improved, or an >> API is not right, please let me know. >> > > There is one very important point, I like to to see not improved: > Currently web.py is small, relatively easy to understand and one > can use it even on very small machines. Even without database and > omitting the template system. I like this very much - it is a huge > advantage over Django etc. (I'm using Django as well, but for > other types of applications.) >
web.py will continue to be small, easy to understand and usable on very small machines, even if we make any improvements. What is that you are worries about? Anand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
