On 7/26/11 10:16 AM, =JeffH wrote: > StPete asked... >> On 7/24/11 9:22 PM, websec issue tracker wrote: >>> #12: Remove dependencies on HTTPbis and depend on RFC2616 only >>> >>> -strict-transport-sec has various dependencies (e.g. STS header field >>> ABNF) on HTTPbis. >>> >>> HTTPbis may not complete in a timeframe workable for having -strict- >>> transport-sec go to RFC, so we should remove dependencies on > HTTPbis, and >>> depend on RFC2616 only. >> >> Jeff, just curious: what do you perceive as the likely timeframe for >> publication of both HSTS and HTTPbis? > > As I related in the websec wg session yesterday, httpbis is trying to > get into WG Last Call by the end of 2011, which is a slip from what they > were targeting as of last fall... > > So I decided we shouldn't wait for them (unfortunately). And no one > pushed back on that in the session yesterday.
Yep, just checking. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
