I would like to know early if cert pinning is going to be on the agenda as that is likely to be the reason I would decide to go to Taipei or not.
I am not actually that bothered about the choice of format or syntax. But as I posted earlier, we have four potential types of data that are security policy related and four distinct delivery mechanisms. I would like us to end up with one syntax and one set of semantics across all four delivery mechanisms. To do otherwise is to take a ticket to hell in a handbasket. On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tobias Gondrom <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello dear websec fellows, > > to decide on a slot and length for our meeting in November in Taipei, this > time we would like to start a bit earlier asking for presentations, topics > and ideas. > > Please send proposals and ideas for presentations to Alexey, Yoav and/or > me, if possible until Sep-25 so we can better decide on the length of the > meeting slot, but later will also be ok. Rough ideas are fine at this stage, > anything that will help us in planning the length and scope of the meeting. > > So far we had great progress on the origin draft, entering IESG next week. > So this will most certainly be finished by then. > We could focus on HSTS and the interesting parts of "certificate pinning" > as important topics to make major progress now. > > But I want to also emphasise looking for further topics and presentations. > Anything you would like to raise at the websec meeting, please drop me a > quick note. > > Kind regards, > > Tobias & Alexey > (chairs of websec) > > > > Tobias Gondrom > email: [email protected] > mobile: +447521003005 > > _______________________________________________ > websec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec > > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
