Hello Adam,
On 2011/09/29 11:45, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 PM, "Martin J. Dürst"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2011/09/29 8:26, Adam Barth wrote:
As I recall, the nosniff directive is pretty controversial.
But then, as I recall, the whole business of sniffing is pretty
controversial to start with. Are there differences between the
controversiality of sniffing as such and the controversiality of the nosniff
directive that explain why one is in the draft and the other is not?
The reason why one is in and the other isn't is just historical.
nosniff didn't exist at the time the document was originally written.
Your first answer sounded as if the nosniff directive was too
controversial to be included in any draft, but your second answer seems
to suggest that it was left out by (historical) accident, and that it
might be worth to include it.
Regards, Martin.
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
