On 2011-10-03 08:26, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
On 2011/10/03 7:14, Adam Barth wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Julian
Reschke<[email protected]> wrote:
References: may need updates, such as WEBSOCKETS. Also consider
sorting them
(xml2rfc sortrefs PI).
I've updated WEBSOCKETS. It will probably need to be updated again.
My policy in cases like this is: Whenever I update a draft, I check the
references and update them if needed.
However, the RFC editor is very good at getting these things right, so
there's no need to produce a new draft just because another one as
increased its number.
Indeed. And if you use xml2rfc, those checks can be automated:
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html#checking-references>
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
