On 11/9/11 10:44 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 11/9/11 10:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:39:56 -0800, Peter Saint-Andre
<[email protected]> wrote:
Based on Anne's previous message to this list [1], it seems that we're
actually talking about font representation formats (his examples are
TrueType Collection, OpenType, TrueType, and Web Open Font Format)
instead of particular fonts (e.g., "12pt Georgia Bold Italic") or
typefaces (e.g., "Georgia").
Correct?
Yes. Font formats, not font families.
Thanks for the clarification. That makes like much easier. :)
s/like/life/
There's still the general question of how useful it would be to define
either a top-level content type or subtypes like application/woff, but
at least we've constrained the problem space quite a bit here...
/psa
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
