On 12/12/2011 09:06 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
A year from now, "sha-256" is going to be ambiguous. Better to say
"sha2-256".
Good point, and one that might be made on the SAAG list as well.
It's already somewhat ambiguous now that NIST has
defined SHA[-2]-512/256.
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsDrafts.html#fips-180-4
- Marsh
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
