I'd incorrectly said: > >> -- in first paragraph, is the link to informative reference >> [I-D.ietf-tls-ssl-version3] the best we can get, as it is a long expired >> I-D? > > Yes, for SSLv3, that's the canonical reference -- it never progressed further. > I've added an annotation to the reference.
thx to Yngve for reminding me about.. The Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Protocol Version 3.0 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6101> ..which was (finally) published in August 2011. I'll fix this faux pas in -07. =JeffH _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
