[Changed Murray's address to his new one.] >> Section 3: Are the latter two paragraphs really necessary? I only find >> such >> statements useful when minimum conformance is not the same thing as full >> conformance. > > It's apparently helpful for readers with a strong W3C-style spec background. > I'll leave them in.
It might be a good idea, then, to put something like the following in at the beginning of the section: [[IESG Note: This section is for readers with a background in W3C specification style, of which we expect many. RFC Editor, please remove this note before publication.]] This will avoid the same question/complaint from ADs during IESG evaluation. I also suggest that you move the 2119 paragraph to the end of the section, to keep all three compliance-related paragraphs together. Barry _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
