New rev:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10


full issue ticket list for strict-transport-sec:
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/query?status=assigned&status=closed&status=new&status=reopened&component=strict-transport-sec&order=id>

Redline spec diff from previous rev:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10.txt

side-by-side diff from previous rev:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10.txt


Change Log is below.


=JeffH


==============================================================


Appendix D. Change Log


   [RFCEditor: please remove this section upon publication as an RFC.]

   Changes are grouped by spec revision listed in reverse issuance
   order.

D.1.  For draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec

      Changes from -09 to -10:

      1.  Added "(including when following HTTP redirects [RFC2616])" to
          section 8.3.  This addresses issue ticket #47.
          <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/47>

      2.  Fixed max-age value in section 10.1.  Substituted 7776000
          (actually 90 days) for 778000 (only 9 days).  This addresses
          issue ticket #48.
          <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/48>

      3.  Added mention of "Certificate Status Request" TLS extension
          [RFC6066] aka "OCSP stapling" to example in section 10.3.
          This addresses issue ticket #49.
          <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/49>


      Changes from -08 to -09:

<snip/>

---
end
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

Reply via email to