Hi Brad,

ah ok. Thanks for explaining. It seems I also first misunderstood your request. ;-)

In that light maybe two additional proposals/requests we should discuss before that in our websec meeting:
1. how about a quick update on WebAppSec by EKR, Jeff and/or you?

2. And then as I mentioned before, if we discuss where to put FO, maybe we should try to actually look at the overarching question first, regarding the bucket of things for CSP, asking the question which ones of them should be in CSP and which ones should be done individually. And somewhat related, which ones should be done in WebAppSec and which ones should be done in Websec?

How about?

Best regards, Tobias


On 18/07/12 16:19, Hill, Brad wrote:
Yes, this is the CSP vs. frame-options discussion - sorry to be oblique.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 3:33 AM
To: Hill, Brad
Cc: Tobias Gondrom; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [websec] Websec WG meeting in Vancouver July-31 - submit
agenda topics until July-21?

On 18/07/2012 00:29, Hill, Brad wrote:
Tobias,
Hi Brad,
   I'd like to ask for some time on the agenda to discuss the future policy
conveyance for framing/embedding options for HTTP resources.
Is this related to draft-ietf-websec-frame-options-00 relationship to CSP
discussion, or is it a new topic?
EKR and JeffH will be in Vancouver from the WebAppSec WG and I will be
participating remotely.
Thanks,

Brad Hill
W3C WebAppSec WG co-chair

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Tobias Gondrom
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [websec] Websec WG meeting in Vancouver July-31 - submit
agenda topics until July-21?
Importance: High

Hi websec fellows,

our websec meeting in Vancouver has been scheduled for Tuesday
July-31 morning 9:00-10:20 in Room "Georgia B". Very much looking
forward to meeting you all there!

As fortunately HSTS has passed WGLC and is now in IETF LC, we will
have to opportunity to focus on new topics for websec and progress
our other work items, e.g. the frameworks requirements, cert pinning,
etc.
If you have a presentation topic or new topic for websec, please let
us know ASAP, so we can work on the agenda. Please, document authors
and interested presenters contact Alexey and me ASAP about your
topics and how much time you need to present.

This time we will also have a remote presentation capability (Webex)
in addition to the audio stream and jabber, so in case you can not
make it to Vancouver, you can have a better meeting experience and
could even present remotely!

As we are currently preparing the agenda for the websec meeting,
please submit proposals for presentations and discussions to Alexey,
Yoav and myself as soon as possible as we will have to prepare and
close the agenda for websec very soon.

Kind regards and looking forward to our meeting in Vancouver!

Tobias
(websec co-chair)





_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

Reply via email to