Just on one point... On 11/15/2012 01:53 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > But right now the scheme could fit in WebSec or could fit in HTTPbis or > even the proposed Web Authentication WG.
The proposal is for an HTTP authentication WG and not for a broader web authentication WG. Only worth pointing out since that caused some confusion at the BoF. Ta, S. _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
