Session Management sounds good to me. (And we could change the name anytime over the evolution of the draft.)
Best regards, Tobias On 18/03/13 20:14, Yoav Nir wrote: > I'm kind of partial to "session management" > > On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The main substantive query that seemed to be raised in the meeting was >> what we are going to call this session continuation thing. I am not >> that worried about confusion with HTTP-Auth. Folk who know, know. >> >> But one of the objectives here is to replace cookies. So choosing a >> name that positions the spec as a successor to authentication cookies >> is actually quite important. >> >> >> How about Session Bound State as the term of art? >> >> -- >> Website: http://hallambaker.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > websec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
