On Aug 9, 2014, at 8:46 PM, Eric Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> The best scenario, of course, is if a site's HSTS policy is pre-deployed to 
> the browser

These things tend to work for big sites (Facebook, bank of america, Amazon) and 
not so well for smaller sites.  I wonder if a good modification to HSTS would 
be to have an “includeParent” directive. Of course we can’t let a subdomain 
specify a policy for a parent domain, but it could serve as a hint, triggering 
the UA to probe the parent domain as you suggested. 

That said, this is yet more evidence that cookies are hopelessly broken. 

Yoav
(not wearing any hats)

_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

Reply via email to