> In general it would be good to answer questions in the current IESG review > process phase timely and one by one as that will help the ADs to close the > process on the draft in a timely manner. If we wait too long, some may need > to read the draft again just to refresh their memory when casting their vote > to publish.
This is a good point, and thanks for making it, Tobias. Yes, it's frequently the case that too much delay in having the discussion causes the AD to have to regain context, which results in more delay and disrupts the AD's other work more. Barry _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
