-----Original Message----- From: Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 6:32 PM To: Tobias Gondrom <[email protected]> Cc: Yoav Nir <[email protected]>; Robert Linder <[email protected]>; websec <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [websec] Regarding RFC 6797
>On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Tobias Gondrom <[email protected]> >wrote: >> I agree. Preload is probably the easiest way to go. >> And the use case of transfer of domain ownership can not be ignored. >> >> Not sure whether preload really needs further standardization, after >> all there are only a few browser implementations out there. >> However, if you think that is needed, feel free to drop me a message >> and we can write up a quick ID and publish it as individual ID. > I think it'd be good to formalize that the preload keyword is used, cannot be > used for something else, and what it's used for. Do you think we need for this an individual RFC or would there be any simpler way we could achieve this? Best regards, Tobias _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
