On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 11:30 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Claudio Saavedra <csaavedra@igalia. > com> wrote: > > So if this is a security bug, I'm understanding that the desired > > behavior would be the one described in 11.2. What can be done in > > the > > specification to deal with this? Can it be reworded/updated? How > > can we > > implementors know which of the behaviors described in 8.1 or 11.2 > > is to > > be honored? > > I'm not sure. Raising errata would be good, but it's always a little > bit unclear to me whether it's going to be accepted, but at least > there's a way to find the issue then (other than browsing the mailing > list), even if not accepted. After that it's probably updating the > document, which is rather involved.
Thanks, I'll raise an errata then and follow 11.2 in the implementation for now. Claudio _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
