On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 14:19 -0400, Elaine Ashton wrote: > > Yes, my example was a bit extreme. I was merely trying to make the > > point that SPAM filtering (regardless of whether the destination is an > > individual or a list of individuals, it makes no difference) can be > > done > > using heuristics other than white lists. > > Filtering spam is likely one of the better points of the software we > have on hand as between the postfix rbls and the spamassassin rule > sets, we punt about 60-95% of all mail coming at the system on any > given day. The thing is that user/subscriber/whitelist management > across 300+ lists is not something simply done in the current model > and wildcards leave holes the size of small countries through which > anyone with sendmail and a little, a very little, knowledge could > drive anything they wanted through. I'd be happy to demonstrate this > for anyone who doubts how easily mail can be spoofed.
Ah, that's the part I didn't understand. I didn't realize that you already use postfix/spamassassin, and that was still not adequate. Thanks for explaining. -Seb _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
