>>>>> "Laurent" == Laurent Blume <[email protected]> writes:

Mike> AFAICS, the Constitution doesn't define what it means to be a project
Mike> Contributor.  That leaves it up to the project leaders to decide
Mike> who's a (project) Contributor, doesn't it?

Laurent> Yes, so we would need to establish a way for Project leaders to
Laurent> define those. Practically, this amount to a per-user
Laurent> definition, right?

Well, yes and no.  Yes, in that a per-user decision is made whether to
grant the user a particular role.  But no, in that the permissions would
be based on the role definition, not on an ad hoc per-user set of
permissions.

Laurent> Can I still point out that some well known wikis around are
Laurent> full of spam, and that reporting it seems to go in a
Laurent> black-hole, so all is not well in wikiland,

I agree that some vigilance is required on the part of the community.
But even on a publicly accessible wiki like genunix, I haven't found it
onerous to clean up after spammers.

Laurent> I'm also wary in general of growing list of people with all the
Laurent> same theorical level of responsibilities, In my experience, it
Laurent> often dilutes individual responsibility so much that in the
Laurent> end, nobody assumes it. 

I agree that if everybody is responsible, then nobody is responsible,
and that can lead to nobody taking action.  But I don't think granting
permission is the same as assigning responsibility.  I view this more as
empowering people to help.

Mike> Are you saying that someone could get Contributor status without
Mike> having signed an SCA, but that Sun would want an SCA on file
Mike> before the person is allowed to edit pages?

Laurent> Exactly.  

That's an interesting point, so I asked about this at a meeting this
morning.  My understanding is that while an SCA would be preferred,
Section 11 of the website Terms Of Use[1] effectively grants Sun a
license to whatever content a user might post.

Laurent> My vote goes for establishing technical roles totally different
Laurent> from the constitutional roles, and please, with different names
Laurent> - we've got enough naming confusion already.

Yeah, I'm starting to think that separating them would be a good idea.
Though I think I'd like to see this dealt with as post-migration
cleanup.  There are some significant operational and functional
advantages to getting off the current portal software.

mike

Footnotes: 
[1]  http://www.opensolaris.org/os/tou/

_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to