On 2011-01-19 1:16 AM, Michael Wheatland wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:38 PM, David Nelson wrote: >> Hi Narayan, Michael :-) >> The most recent SC meeting re-stated the same openess to that *in the >> mid-term future*. But it was clearly desired to put an end to what has >> become a disruptive argument backed up by what has been, IMHO, >> disruptive disinformation about the SC's stance, in a quest to >> "bulldoze" the adoption through.
> You are incorrect. The development and discussions were as a result of > the official SC statement to the website mailing list: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.website/592 Wow. Kind of demolishes the claims of how 'clear' everything was. On 2011-01-19 5:42 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: > I thought I had read apologies from Charles on the list. Charles' 'apology' was nothing of the sort... in fact I consider it an even bigger insult to Michael and the Drupal team than everything else that happened... sorry, Charles', but I don't think that the problem was a lack of 'barking orders' from you. Anyway, I'm done (again) with this thread... hopefully the new initiative that David and Michael are working on will enable the community to outlive these growing pains. -- Best regards, Charles -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
