Hi,
2011.01.25 21:54, Rimas Kudelis rašė:
2011.01.25 18:38, David Nelson rašė:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 00:42, Charles-H. Schulz
<[email protected]> wrote:
We are aware of the decision by the Steering Committee, and are as well
aware of the need for discernment, especially when it's about long time
localizers who are supposed to know what they are doing... :-)
But, Charles, perhaps that kind of peremptory action of undoing a
contributor's work with no attempt whatsoever to discuss the matter in
a rational manner should not be encouraged - not even from an SC
member, if the project's governance is to have any credibility.
Please may I ask that the page be left as I published it, to give
others the chance to read the information and appreciate its merits,
until the next SC meeting, at which time we could discuss the matter
together?
I've just read the current version of
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/localizers/ . It's perhaps a
bit weird and vague (lots of talk, little info), but on the other
hand, I think this page targets those who only want to become
localizers, or maybe even have no idea what localization is. For those
of us, who already are localizers, I think our wiki would be the right
place to put (technical) info and seek for it.
Disclamer: I haven't seen Sophie's version, so this opinion is
probably a bit skewed.
I've just read Sophie's version of the page on http://pastie.org/1500466
. Basically, I think both pages convey the same ideas, but while I think
Nelson's version has a bit more info, it allso seems to have a much
lower signal/noise ratio. Indeed, I think that this particular page
could be shortened at least twice, without losing much (any?) important
information.
Rimas
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
