On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:50:07 +0800, David Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, :-) > > -1 for publishing it. It was enough to have the discussions, I think. > Most planned participants weren't there anyway, and there were muliple > technical problems. Leave it to history. ;-) > > David Nelson
I think we should publish it. If I see right, Michael is basing the Wiki-Restructure on the call of yesterday and we should have the proof. And also i would like to search for something I didn't quite understand. (I mixed up the persons who where talking). In fact we are not realy quite sure, what the Website-Team is all about. I'm for the moment quit confused. Because I think what the people think about the Website and how it should look is realy not adequat for the 21st century. I understand that my approach yesterday which I proposed for the Remaking of the Interface of the Website is not in the spirit how a OpenSource Project works. But I think if we want to get more people to use Open Source we should focus to make it appeal to this people. LibreOffice is not only for Geeks and Enterprises also for the normal people who can't afford expensive Software. (Econimic crisis ahoi) My approach to the website is a little bit crazy, but you should think not only in your box. The Libreoffice is in my eyes there to give the download, an explanation and the "door" to the community. All the rest is up to the TDF to give the community their place to work. Website >< Community Worktools. -- Mike Houben UI - Coding - Animation http://www.crazyhstudio.net -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
