Hi Michael, please try to work on your quoting, the fullquotes are a very bad habit...
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Michael Wheatland <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Christian Lohmaier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Michael Wheatland > > Rimas is correct, I was referring to Silverstripe's behaviour. This is not silverstripe, but just how javascript behaves. > If this is a non-pluggable part of the Silverstripe UI, I don't expect > you to do anything about it. I just think it is poorly implemented UI > and was looking for other options to improve our experience. That's bullshit, sorry. When there is a "bug" (in this case in your eyes a usability bug), it should be fixed. Calling it "poorly implemented UI" because you have a strong opinion about it (and others don't care/can live with it) is strongly biased. Again: Why should there be multiple different UI layers to manage? That is stupid to do. Have one UI that works and be it. As you might have noticed in other places, silverstripe is not always using a javascript prompt. Just that specific feature does. Seeing your chance to bash silverstripe because of it, great, you got your fun. Now please get back to being objective and talking in a reasonable fashion. ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
