Michael,
Le Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:02:34 +0930, Michael Wheatland <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Charles-H. Schulz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unless I'm misstaken we have no actual plans to redesign the > > website in any substantial way for at least 6 months... > > There is always room for improvement, and as we seem to have the > vibrancy and resources I would love to see the website team step up > and do what they do best. If we don't make improvements for 6 months, > as you have suggested we will risk underutilization of the new members > and losing them due to a perceived lack of interest. While there is always room for improvement -I understand you talk about incremental progress (fixing bugs on the website, etc.)- I do not believe that continuously remaking the website is what desirable. Also, it's a matter of priority. I understand there are many volunteers for the website, but then it's perhaps necessary to understand that we may not need to have these contributions just because there are people who would like to help. Don't get me wrong: it's not about rejecting anyone, it's about setting priorities. There many other areas who need volunteers: Quality Assurance for instance (it does not require programming skills, just method and patience), or documentation, or even the focus of our effort, development: there are many ideas out there, on the wiki, from easy stuff to more complex efforts that are only waiting to be implemented... On the other hand it's quite frustrating for someone like me to see that many things related to the website require so much investment of time, energy and effort for something that is simply not our focus. We spend waaay too much time trying to manage people who absolutely want to do something with the website. That's nice, but there's a limit beyond which it does not help our project. > > As far as I know, the plan was to wait until David presented the work > he had compiled, then the whole website team would get involved in the > improving phase. Don't get me wrong, the work David produced is > fantastic, but I know that as a team we can create something that > really represents the quality standard of the LibreOffice software > product. You are absolutely welcome to work with the website team! But I don't have the feeling they want to restart the website over and over again. > > I am not sure who you are referring to by 'we', but these plans were > discussed at length on the recent conference call, and the team has > people who are willing to get on board and help out 'now'. If I remember what was discussed it was clear that while help was welcome on the website it wasn't for an overhaul. Best, Charles. > > Thanks, > Michael Wheatland > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
